121- Unstable is not Stabilizer
Now that it has become evident that time is not a fixed and stable factor, how can we consider this unreal and uncertain entity as a dimension? More importantly, how can it be a criterion of reference to prove the other three uncertain dimensions?
My fellow bright-minded friends and scientists, is what I say anything but the truth? Contemplate, think, and answer. However, I also accept the relative and human construct "time". Furthermore, when the term "time" is being used in these articles, my intention is this form of time.
Space has four dimensions, and its fourth dimension is time. No object in the universe can be evaluated using only three dimensions. It cannot be scaled using length, width, and height. Time should be added to them since it is complementary to the three dimensions.
Einstein
Time cannot be considered a nothingness, except when it is distinct from space. However, when they are together (as they are), movement emerges, which is the essence of substances and the essence of all beings.
Alexander
Time is eternal, and it is the source of any accretion and development. Time and space are motives that ascend creatures towards significant dispositions.
Alexander
Time is different from space; in fact, these two are opposite and contradictory to one another.
Bergson
Bergson believes that Einstein’s redundant times (meaning that they slow down with speed) are hypothetical and determined times that are fully compliant with the existence of a real and general time in the universe and are, in fact, parts of it. Since there are no times without intelligence, then the general universal time leads us directly towards a universal intelligence that encircles durations with different amounts, without absorbing them.
The problem of time and space and their infiniteness is beyond the boundaries of thoughts and understandings of us humans. It can be considered, along with logic, as the cruelest executioner of human beings.
Edna Mono